|
**Maxi**'s Good Aggro Deck |
|
|
|
Written by Roland
|
|
Friday, 21 December 2007 |
Average user rating2.5out of 5 Well, I know Good is about the most maligned symbol in UFS, but with Set 7 (specifically Darkstalkers) adding so much good material for Good, my OK **Maxi** has been terrorizing my fellow gamers as of late.� Have a look and tell me what you think:
NOTE: I haven't been playing UFS for that long, so you won't see any cards from, say, SF01 or anything like that, so I may not have the best cards available in all of UFS.
Main Symbol: Good
Starting Character:
**Maxi** (6 HS 27 Vitality)
Characters (5):
2 *Maxi* (5 HS 24 Vitality)
3 **Maxi** (6 HS 27 Vitality)
Actions (4):
4 Flashy Display (0/3 +2M Split Card)
Assets (3):
3 Soryuju (4/3 +2M)
Attacks (22):
3 Steel Dragon (3/2 4H2 +1M)
4 Illusion Kick (4/2 3L3 +1H Breaker:1)
3 Rolling Buckler (4/2 4L3 +3H Powerful:2)
2 Sand Splash (4/3 4M3 +2M Stun:1)
4 Mark of the Beast (5/3 4M4 +2M)
4 Paguna Paguna (5/3 4L4 +1H)
2 Fury (6/2 4M3 +3M Multiple:2)
Foundations (26):
4 Cheerful (1/6 +1L)
4 Empire's Ruin (1/5 +2M)
2 Headstrong (1/5 +2L)
4 Nothing to Lose (1/5)
4 Pirate from Ryukyu (2/5)
4 Shissen Karihadi (2/6)
4 Tendon Strength (3/4 +3L)
Side Deck (15):
3 Mark of the Dragon (4/2 5M3)
4 Drifting Moon (5/3 3M4 +1L)
4 Roam the World (2/4)
4 Spiritual Center (2/5 +2H)
Comments:
I don't know the maximum Side Deck size for UFS (excuse my ignorance) so I went with 15, please tell me if it's different.� The deck strategy is basically drop 3 or 4 foundations on the first turn (hopefully at least 1 Pirate from Ryukyu) and then ATTACK, ATTACK, and ATTACK some more!� A lot of the attacks here can lower other attacks' difficulty, so if you hit once, you're probably dropping your hand on his head.� Honestly, I like **Maxi** and I would like him to see some tournament play.� So if you want to play an oddball deck at the next UFS tournament, try it out!
| Average user rating | Average user rating from: 4 users
| |
| | | | | | All User Reviews | |
|
|
Last Updated ( Friday, 21 December 2007 )
|
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?


Report as inappopriate
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?


Report as inappopriate
Was this review helpful to you?


Report as inappopriate
1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
Was this review helpful to you?


Report as inappopriate