Welcome back everyone. Today I
want to talk about something many of us think we are familiar with: the concept
of luck; particularly how luck applies to UFS. Many believe that UFS has a
higher percentage of luck involved that many, if not all other CCGs because of
the nature of control checks. Some believe UFS is almost 100% luck, arguing
that the coin flip, and thus the first turn is decisive, and nothing can really
be done about it. Luck is extremely prevalent in the card board world, but
hopefully as we progress, I'll be able to show you it's not really as bad as it
seems.
Lucky Ducky
What is luck?
Webster puts it like this:
Luck
-noun
1 a : a force that brings good
fortune or adversity b : the events or circumstances that operate
for or against an individual
2: favorite
chance; also success.
Notice
how "uncontrollable" is nowhere in that definition. The parts of UFS dependent
on luck are:
-
Your draws (opening hand and subsequent draws)
-
Your Control Checks (somewhat)
Of these points there is really
only one that is completely out of the average player's control, and that is
the Matchup/ Pairing, that is, the opponent/ deck assigned to oppose you at any
given stage of a tournament, and even this can be prepared for with an accurate
read of the metagame. Still, an unfavorable matchup is an unfavorable
matchup-most of the time you just have to be the one positioned correctly.
The Coin Flip
This is probably the most
controversial aspect of UFS. Going first is considered by many to be an
overwhelming advantage particularly if your deck is (insert symbol) aggro.
Being on the play is often equated with winning the game. I find this notion to
be incredibly flawed, however. It seems many players just don't understand how to play second. Going second, your
hand simply has a different use than it would if you were playing first. Some
hands that are dynamite openings on the play, are a death sentence on the draw.
The inverse can also be true, however, let's analyze this further.
It is said that when two
aggressive decks collide, the deck playing first wins. I believe that this
notion stems from the fact many players will keep their hands based on similar
if not the same criteria they would use if they were on the play, and then
proceed to play out that hand as if they themselves were on the play, and not
going second.
To draw a parallel, let's look at
Chess, one of the oldest strategy games in existence. Going first is seen as an
advantage in that game as well, however, by contrast, going second is
thoroughly understood. As only one piece can be moved a turn, the player going
second knows that he need to make up the lost turn of development, while
simultaneously keeping himself out of traps AND
prevent himself from losing any further ground (by retreating). Some will
say that UFS cannot be compared to Chess or Magic, because of the dynamic and
explosive nature or UFS, you can essentially play your whole hand each turn if
you were inclined to do so. However, I recommend that you see each complete
turn in UFS as your play. Leading off with 3-4 foundations is the same as
moving your first pawn, or opening with a knight, or laying a land and a
one-drop in Magic, or simply dropping a land and passing. It is the play you
chose to open with, when you could just as easily have attacked and played 1
foundation, or just played two foundations. Admittedly, UFS is given to faster
games, but that's why we like it, right? Each turn is a very important play as
a whole.
So, if you're the aggro deck,
playing second against another aggro deck, it would not be wise to keep a 5
foundation hand with the aim of playing each one of those foundations. Going
first, this play would seem ideal, but on the draw it is quite the opposite. If
you succeed in playing those cards, congratulations, you are very well
developed, but you may not survive to see the next turn. Chances are, you've
delivered yourself right into your opponent's hands! He'll ready up, draw his
hand and if he's lucky (and you aren't), he'll proceed to start playing around
the last 1-3 cards in your hand with the aim of finishing you off, an
enterprise which you facilitated with your last play.
Chess has several well know
gambits; openings that are intended to illicit a set of responses from the
opponent. An analogue to this would be a choreographed dance routine, or even
footwork in fencing or boxing. When I
move this way, you move that way, etc. UFS is no different. I open up my
attack chains with Chain Throw because either my opponent is going to block it
and take 3, and as a consequence be at -1 cards in hand and +1 difficulty to
his next block, or he's going to take 5. If your opponent is Ultra Rare Adon
and he chooses to go second, you need
to assume he's going to rearrange your face on his turn and play accordingly.
You need a foundation set up, but you also need to keep enough blocks if the
worst case scenario (Adon has a fistful of throws) proves to be true.
If you are the aggro deck going
second, you need to be prepared to defend yourself, above all else. Do not
overextend, because when you do, if you don't win, you lose. It's really that
simple. Chances are, when you play well, your opponent's will overextend trying
to beat you, and all they really accomplish is defeating themselves when you
ready up and drop death on them.
Your Matchup / Pairing
Few things in a tournament can be
as unlucky as being paired against that obscure deck you definitely expected
not to see, or are just terrible against. You know what I mean, Stamp Combo,
Kubi Ori infinite, Starter Ken. These "random" pairings can occur for any
reason: Your opponent is playing old tech (which is not the same as "bad"
tech), you drew in your last round and got paired against another dreadfully
slow redux deck, everyone expected discard to be dead (including you) and you
run smack into a fierce discard control deck unprepared. Whatever the reason,
you have very little control over your specific matchups. Just about the only
thing you can do, is come prepared. You know Air Yun-Seong is popular, so you
angle a portion of your deck against him. You know hybrids are everywhere, so
you plan accordingly. Knowing how to read the metagame is an ever-important
skill, one every tournament player should at least be attempting to master. If
you are positioned correctly, there shouldn't be too many matchups that can
catch you off guard. Only something completely new and original (and good,
please note that original ≠ good) can completely blow you away. It's like my
Saturday morning heroes always told me: knowing is half the battle.
Your Draws
This can simultaneously be the
most rewarding and most frustrating aspect of UFS. Unlike many other games, UFS
allows you to draw multiple cards each turn. This makes for some incredibly
consistent decks, but we always have those games in which, despite drawing 35
million cards, your hand has not seen a single Yoga Mastery.
Drawing, naturally, has an element
of luck in a randomized deck. Your draws, however, can be manipulated with
redundancies, or adhering to the 60-card minimum. Certain characters,
foundations and actions allow you to draw even more cards. STG has been very
careful printing these cards, and rightfully so. Because UFS allows you to play
so many cards in a turn, any card that allows you to draw 2-3 cards without any
downside would be very powerful indeed. It might as well give your character
+2-3 handsize! Drawing extra cards, however, increases the chances of you
finding a particular card, and reduces the "luck of the draw". Due to UFS'
natural drawing, however, the chances of bad draws are fairly low, and this
particular point is almost a non-issue. That is, of course, until it happens to
you.
Your Control Checks
At last we arrive at the big hairy
monster of UFS. The heart and soul; simultaneously the greatest strength of UFS
and the bane of its existence. There are those that believe that UFS is
constantly at the whim of luck due to the nature of control checks. There are
those that have pulled their hair out over them, and others, like me, who are
going gray far too early. I quietly steam when I fail the game-clinching
control check. When I do, everyone seems to feel the need to say "I told you
so." Despite all that, I hold fast to this assertion: While there is a high
incidence of luck involved, control checks are absolutely manageable. If
control checks are at the whims of luck, then luck is at the mercy of
mathematics.
Flipping a 2, or a 1 (even 3 is not
desirable), is considered the worst possible thing that can happen to you
during the course of a turn. It's something we have no control over, right?
Wrong.
In a 60-card deck containing 4
cards with control values of 2, the chance of "flipping a 2" at any given point
in time is 7%. Draw one of these cards, and it drops to 5%. There are ways to
manipulate this number. You can simply add cards to the deck. The chances of
you flipping a 2 in a 70-card deck is 5.7% at any given time. Doing this,
however, may reduce the consistencies of you draws, however, so use this tactic
with caution.
Certain foundations and characters
can even help you smooth out bad control checks. Full Power is one of my
favorite cards of the new Battle Pack, and the new Akumas are all about getting
that number right in the bottom right corner.
Another tactic is not to play
control values lower that three. Some decks I've heard of only have 8 cards
with control values lower than 5 (the rest of the attacks are clones, and
such). I'm pretty sure these decks almost never have problems with control
checks. Trust the math, and believe me when I say that if you have problems
with control checks, so does the rest of the world. It is a dilemma each of us
as UFS players must deal with in our own ways, whether it's playing Promo Taki,
and never bothering to check for attacks, like my "cursed" friend Efrain (who
always flips a Seichu for a Seichu), or you're like me and play Evil to Float
like a Butterfly and never check lower than 4. Control checks have a way of
making a level playing field by applying even pressure on everyone. Now let me
ask you this: are you the guy that scoops because you failed to play the first
foundation of the game? Or do you quietly steam and sweep the card into the discard
pile and say "go"? How you answer will tell you a lot about yourself. It's not
over ‘til it's over, remember that.
The Assets of Power
In exactly one week from when I
type these words, UFS players will be converging on Orlando,
FL, to fight it out and see just who is the
best in the Sunshine
State. As I missed worlds
for budgetary reasons, I'm raring to go for this event. Sadly, my local
playgroup has just about burned out, the conglomeration formerly known as Team
Rocket has disbanded, and I will be the only one carrying the banner for Tampa to Orlando.
Naturally, I'd like to see top spot go to a Gulf
Coast player, and see Tampa put on the UFS map, but if it's going
to happen, it looks like it's entirely up to me. I've done some extensive
playtesting and training with a deck of my own design. It's shaped up to be
pretty solid against most decks, and it puts a lot of my theories to use.
Hopefully I place well, in order to prove something to myself, and in order to
show the world that Vik's group isn't the only one full of mudhole stompers
down south. I'll be providing a full tournament report, and hopefully bring
back some pictures for all of you to enjoy. Good luck to everyone going to the
AoP this weekend. See you there. Ha, get it? Luck? C'mon...
Drop me a line at
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
|